Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Title “Son of God” in Ma(God begets not, nor is he begotten (Qur'an, 112:3) part4
03-02-2010, 12:48 AM
Post: #1
The Title “Son of God” in Ma(God begets not, nor is he begotten (Qur'an, 112:3) part4
The Title “Son of God” in Matthew’s Gospel
Students of the Bible will easily notice that the title Son of God is often used in Matthew without agreement from Mark and Luke. For example, what did the passers-by say at the scene of the cross? Their saying is reported in Mark 15:29-30 and also in Matthew 27:40. If you compare the two reports, you will notice that Matthew has added a phrase to the effect that Jesus is the Son of God.

We find another example of this in Matthew 14:22-33. Jesus had just miraculously fed five thousand people with five loaves and two fish. Then he sent his disciples to the other side of the sea. After praying to God, Jesus went out miraculously walking on the sea to meet his disciples. Eventually he got into the boat with them. How did the disciples react to all this? Mark and Matthew give us two different answers. Mark says:

“And they were utterly astounded, for they did not understand about the loaves, but their hearts were hardened” (Mark 6:51-52).

In Matthew, however, the disciples were not perplexed at all. They had it all figured out and they knew exactly what to do. Matthew says:

“And those in the boat worshipped him, saying, “Truly you are the Son of God”” (Matthew 14:33).

Again, Matthew has improved the story to show that Jesus is the Son of God.

It may be useful here to see what Bible commentaries say about this difference. In Matthew’s Gospel, the New American Bible has a footnote saying as follows:

“This confession is in striking contrast to the Markan parallel where the disciples are “completely astounded”” (Revised New Testament, p. 35).

In the Pelican New Testament Commentaries, author John Fenton reminds us that in Mark the disciples were uncomprehending. Fenton then comments:

“Matthew omits this, because in his Gospel the disciples are presented as men who have been given insight” (The Gospel of Saint Matthew, p. 247).

The difference here between Matthew and Mark was pointed out also in Harper’s Bible Commentary. Commenting on Matthew, the editors say:

“Instead of reacting, as in Mark, with incomprehension, the whole crew confesses Jesus as the Son of God” (1988 edition, p. 967).

So can we know what really happened? Commenting on the same passage in Matthew’s Gospel, the Interpreter’s One-Volume Commentary on the Bible says:

“The presence of Matthew’s favorite phrase little faith suggests either that he has created this story or that he has reworked it to suit his purpose” (p. 627).

As we have said before, careful study reveals that the title Son of God is not one that Jesus claimed for himself. Nor did his true disciples call him by that title.

In the next part, God willing, we will point out some other changes which Bible students should know about.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
03-02-2010, 09:07 AM
Post: #2
RE: The Title “Son of God” in Ma(God begets not, nor is he begotten (Qur'an, 112:3) part4
"As we have said before, careful study reveals that the title Son of God is not one that Jesus claimed for himself. Nor did his true disciples call him by that title.

In the next part, God willing, we will point out some other changes which Bible students should know about."

Before trying to give advice about how Christians should read their Scriptures you would do well to read them more carefully yourself.

"He said to them, 'But who do you say that I am?"
And Simon Peter answered and said, 'You are the Christ, the Son of the living God."
Jesus answered and said to him, "Blessed are you, Simon-Bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in heaven."

No, Jesus Christ does not call himself the Son of God, he always refers to himself as the Son of Man. But he doesn't contradict those who do call him the Son of God. The Gospels make no sense if they are not referring to Jesus Christ as the Son of God. Jesus Christ of the Gospels is a spiritual being representing all humankind as the Son of Man but also representing God as the Son of God.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
03-02-2010, 09:20 AM
Post: #3
RE: The Title “Son of God” in Ma(God begets not, nor is he begotten (Qur'an, 112:3) part4
(03-02-2010 09:07 AM)biomystic Wrote:  ...Jesus...doesn't contradict those who do call him the Son of God...

You are correct here, but you are responding to a cut-and-paste spambot.

http://www.biblicaltraining.org/ --- http://www.ntwrightpage.com/
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Does the Qur'an really the word of God ??? ahmedgnaoui 14 1,475 08-24-2015 04:53 PM
Last Post: Herminator
  God begets not, nor is he begotten (Qur'an, 112:3) part2 mobkem 10 11,073 06-29-2014 09:35 AM
Last Post: Visqueen
  God sins a lot but is there no end to God’s greed? Greatest I am 28 2,647 05-26-2012 02:59 PM
Last Post: EqualAtheist
  "God's only begotten Son." S-word 21 3,215 05-09-2011 06:57 AM
Last Post: S-word
  God’s only complaint. Hardly anyone is seeking Him. Greatest I am 0 395 09-29-2010 08:34 AM
Last Post: Greatest I am
  The Parable of the Wicked Te(God begets not, nor is he begotten (Qur'an, 112:3) part7 mobkem 5 1,494 03-07-2010 09:38 PM
Last Post: Zagreus
  Calling God “Father” in Matt(God begets not, nor is he begotten (Qur'an, 112:3) part5 mobkem 12 2,984 03-04-2010 08:25 AM
Last Post: Stereophonic
  Jesus is a Servant of GodGod begets not, nor is he begotten (Qur'an, 112:3) part6 mobkem 2 984 03-04-2010 08:17 AM
Last Post: Stereophonic
  Changes in the Bible(God begets not, nor is he begotten (Qur'an, 112:3) part3) mobkem 0 1,657 03-01-2010 01:13 AM
Last Post: mobkem
  God begets not, nor is he begotten (Qur'an, 112:3) mobkem 8 3,850 02-28-2010 01:58 PM
Last Post: biomystic



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)