Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

kevlar · 05-05-2010, 10:13 AM

There a lot of funny things about Jack, but one of the funniest is him saying how quantum mathematics/physics can be made to lie..............lol. But I can prove it with quantum mathematics/physics/electrodynamics/upsydoodleness..................Seriously...........they need to use renormalization in order to eliminate infinity. I personally have no problem with quantum science, I just think that it isn't GOD. Like some other people do.

TheJackel · (This post was last modified: 05-05-2010 11:31 AM by TheJackel.)

(05-05-2010 10:13 AM)kevlar Wrote: There a lot of funny things about Jack, but one of the funniest is him saying how quantum mathematics/physics can be made to lie..............lol. But I can prove it with quantum mathematics/physics/electrodynamics/upsydoodleness..................Seriously...........they need to use renormalization in order to eliminate infinity. I personally have no problem with quantum science, I just think that it isn't GOD. Like some other people do.

Paul and you Kevlar are likely the same person LOL.. Funny how he follows you like a pet Wink

... Is this Kevlar's way of expressing his religious creationist views with the ability to deny it? You both seem equally scientifically illiterate and resort to personal attacks when you can't handle the argument. You both display Christian-realism (anything that doesn't agree with your fallacy is "evil").. In this case I'm the Evil Jackass LMAO.. Seriously, that's desperate snake oil sales pitch in attempt to make you feel like you have any credibility..

And no quantum physics isn't made to lie for the purpose of lying kiddo.Tha'ts not how it works in the academic arena kids.. It's done so because physicists like to shoot for the impossible to see if the impossible is possible, or if they can cheat the impossible. They never state that the impossible is ever possible.. And this is a process in which induces learning and discovery.

And I don't think quantum physics is a GOD either Kevlar, I mean Paul Wink

.. GOD implies intelligent cognitive being.. Physics is only a description of process to which can be applicably applied, verified, and substantiated.. And that alone is well beyond the hilarious fallacy of Pixie fairies in the sky..

kevlar · 05-05-2010, 11:32 AM

Oh Jack you know very well that I can supply one of your quotes to prove my point, even though in the most part I was being facetious, do TRY to exist in this paradigm, JACK. Big Grin

~~prdamico~~ · 05-05-2010, 10:12 PM

lol, If jacka$$ actually READ the posts he replies too, he might actually make some good arguments. I don't even bother with him anymore, I have proven time and time again that he either does not read the posts he replies to or he does not understand what he reads. Of course I am sure it is very confusing in his mind. After all according to him, human beings are the only conscious beings in the universe, there are no other beings with intelligence equal to or above ours, lol.

like I said he's just

another (brainwashed ) brick in the wall.

always has been, and always will be. but that is not my concern, if he wants to be a MORON, so be it. he is a lost cause.....let him stay lost, the sun will still come up tomorrow, anyways.................lmao..

:-0

TheJackel · 05-06-2010, 12:50 AM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_...of_context

The practice of quoting out of context, sometimes referred to as "contextomy" or "quote mining", is a logical fallacy and type of false attribution in which a passage is removed from its surrounding matter in such a way as to distort its intended meaning.[1]

Arguments based on this fallacy typically take two forms. As a straw man argument, which is frequently found in politics, it involves quoting an opponent out of context in order to misrepresent their position (typically to make it seem more simplistic or extreme) in order to make it easier to refute. As an appeal to authority, it involves quoting an authority on the subject out of context, in order to misrepresent that authority as supporting some position.[2]

This is about as Good as Kevlar's argument gets.. And Paul, you are no better.. You simply got owned in the science debate and you can't handle it.. So you attach your fallacy arguments that have no evidence to support them as some divine truth because there are currently some "unknowns" or un-answered questions about our Universe.. Essentially that is pleading snake sales pitching to make room for your Pixie Sky Fairy as if un-answered or un-verified theories (that do have evidence) some how prove the existence of your magical sky fairy LMAO..

And it makes you wonder where your argument will go once the unification of all 4 forces are complete.. Hence the only unified force atm is Gravity.. All the other forces have been unified.. And gravity isn't even required for life, and neither is the weak force of energy..

You are essentially pissed off because you're scientifically illiterate. And it's amazing how little you know about the scientific world.. Especially for someone that claims to have studied science LMAO.. And it's pretty sad when I can post youtube videos of religious scientists agreeing with me in regards to how dumb you are when it concerns science.. You essentially made yourself out to be a complete idiot. And I should quote mine all your idiocy concerning science and make a thread on it..

kevlar · 05-06-2010, 05:27 AM

(05-05-2010 11:28 AM)TheJackel Wrote:
(05-05-2010 10:13 AM)kevlar Wrote: There a lot of funny things about Jack, but one of the funniest is him saying how quantum mathematics/physics can be made to lie..............lol. But I can prove it with quantum mathematics/physics/electrodynamics/upsydoodleness..................Seriously...........they need to use renormalization in order to eliminate infinity. I personally have no problem with quantum science, I just think that it isn't GOD. Like some other people do.

Paul and you Kevlar are likely the same person LOL.. Funny how he follows you like a pet ... Is this Kevlar's way of expressing his religious creationist views with the ability to deny it? You both seem equally scientifically illiterate and resort to personal attacks when you can't handle the argument. You both display Christian-realism (anything that doesn't agree with your fallacy is "evil").. In this case I'm the Evil Jackass LMAO.. Seriously, that's desperate snake oil sales pitch in attempt to make you feel like you have any credibility..

And no quantum physics isn't made to lie for the purpose of lying kiddo.Tha'ts not how it works in the academic arena kids.. It's done so because physicists like to shoot for the impossible to see if the impossible is possible, or if they can cheat the impossible. They never state that the impossible is ever possible.. And this is a process in which induces learning and discovery.

And I don't think quantum physics is a GOD either Kevlar, I mean Paul .. GOD implies intelligent cognitive being.. Physics is only a description of process to which can be applicably applied, verified, and substantiated.. And that alone is well beyond the hilarious fallacy of Pixie fairies in the sky..

Lying ad hominem and delusional, Jack, who the hell were you talking to..........hahahaha Big Grin

TheJackel · 05-06-2010, 12:48 PM

(05-06-2010 05:27 AM)kevlar Wrote:
(05-05-2010 11:28 AM)TheJackel Wrote:
(05-05-2010 10:13 AM)kevlar Wrote: There a lot of funny things about Jack, but one of the funniest is him saying how quantum mathematics/physics can be made to lie..............lol. But I can prove it with quantum mathematics/physics/electrodynamics/upsydoodleness..................Seriously...........they need to use renormalization in order to eliminate infinity. I personally have no problem with quantum science, I just think that it isn't GOD. Like some other people do.

Paul and you Kevlar are likely the same person LOL.. Funny how he follows you like a pet ... Is this Kevlar's way of expressing his religious creationist views with the ability to deny it? You both seem equally scientifically illiterate and resort to personal attacks when you can't handle the argument. You both display Christian-realism (anything that doesn't agree with your fallacy is "evil").. In this case I'm the Evil Jackass LMAO.. Seriously, that's desperate snake oil sales pitch in attempt to make you feel like you have any credibility..

And no quantum physics isn't made to lie for the purpose of lying kiddo.Tha'ts not how it works in the academic arena kids.. It's done so because physicists like to shoot for the impossible to see if the impossible is possible, or if they can cheat the impossible. They never state that the impossible is ever possible.. And this is a process in which induces learning and discovery.

And I don't think quantum physics is a GOD either Kevlar, I mean Paul .. GOD implies intelligent cognitive being.. Physics is only a description of process to which can be applicably applied, verified, and substantiated.. And that alone is well beyond the hilarious fallacy of Pixie fairies in the sky..

Lying ad hominem and delusional, Jack, who the hell were you talking to..........hahahaha

Oh, so you can't address this without quote mining and placing them out of context LOL.. Ok, sounds like we can agree to disagree eh Wink

kevlar · 05-06-2010, 12:57 PM

Look I know that if we combined yours and littlejacks IQ's we may reach double figures, but realistically If I quote the entire post, it cannot be quote mining stupid.